Judge Juan Merchan raised a scare Friday when he sent a letter to the lawyers in Donald Trump’s New York criminal case about a social media post that, if genuine, would have raised juror misconduct concerns. But given that the post appears to have been a prank, there’s no reason to think that it will upend Trump’s guilty verdict, though the record may need to be cleared up by the time he is sentenced next month.
Merchan’s letter said that he had just become aware of a Facebook comment on an unrelated state court system post ahead of Trump’s verdict, in which the commenter claimed to be the cousin of a Trump juror and that the supposed juror said that “Trump is getting convicted.”
If that were true, that would raise the prospect of the defense moving to set aside the verdict ahead of sentencing. But the issue, such as it was, was seemingly quickly resolved by the poster, who claimed, in effect, to have been joking.
So Trump’s lawyers are free to try to make an issue of this, but they won’t get far under the known facts and applicable law. Motions to set aside the verdict for juror misconduct need to show:








