UPDATE (Oct. 8, 2024, 10:21 a.m. ET): After the controversy over the state’s specifications for school Bibles, the Oklahoma State Department of Education changed its criteria to allow the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance, the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights to be bound with the Bible or separately from it. It also extended the proposal deadline from Oct. 14 to Oct. 21.
A mandate for Oklahoma public schools to teach the Bible in class went into effect in August amid sharp national criticism and opposition from local school districts. This week, Oklahoma’s Department of Education opened bids for a contract to provide 55,000 Bibles for classrooms across the state, with criteria so specific as to exclude thousands of available Bibles — but not Donald Trump’s infamous “God bless the USA” Bible.
According to the state’s specifications, the Bible must be in the King James version — and must also contain the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance, the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It “must also be bound in leather or leather-like material for durability.”
As Oklahoma Watch points out, many — if not most — Bibles in the marketplace don’t fit those criteria. But one that does tick all the state’s boxes is a $60 Trump-endorsed “God Bless the USA” Bible, which began selling in March and from which Trump has made $300,000 in royalties, according to his latest financial disclosure from August. (A version with Trump’s signature sells for $1,000.)
Another Bible that meets the criteria is a $90 “We The People” Bible, which Donald Trump Jr. promoted in late 2022.
Oklahoma State Superintendent Ryan Walters, the Republican who imposed the school Bible mandate, is a staunch Trump supporter. He endorsed Trump for president last year, saying that he was “excited to see him dismantle the Department of Education.”
A spokesperson for the superintendent told The Hill that “it would be inappropriate to comment while bids are being placed” for a Bible supplier and described the process as “open and transparent” and “consistent with the norms for state procurement.”








