The Met Gala was a visually stunning occasion that put Black people on display — but its blatant materialism overshadowed important discussions about class and what Black power truly means.
The theme — “Superfine: Tailoring Black Style” — is named after an upcoming exhibit at the Metropolitan Museum of Art that celebrates the merger of African and European clothing styles that began in the 18th century, and it was inspired by author and professor Monica Miller’s book “Slaves to Fashion: Black Dandyism and the Styling of Black Diasporic Identity.”
The Gala, an annual fundraiser that raises money for the Manhattan museum’s Costume Institute, was an homage to Black materialism in what the organizers portrayed as its purest form: high fashion sense, and how it apparently has been used to assert Black identity and amass Black power. In essence: The message was that the clothes make the man.
And some of the largest, most luxe fashion brands in the world selected some of the wealthiest, most famous Black people in America as models for their clothing — and avatars for Black greatness — to drive this point home. As if to say the pathway to Black liberation and respectability travels along the seams of a fine-tailored (maybe Gucci-branded?) suit.
I found the looks phenomenal. I also found the air of elitism, classism and respectability politics hard to shake.
I found the looks phenomenal. (You can find some of the best ones here.) I also found the air of elitism, classism and respectability politics hard to shake. In this era of broadening wealth inequality, the idea of the Met’s handpicked Black elites donning expensive threads to convey regality and power at an event largely reserved for the uber-wealthy seemed more than a little out of touch.








