Dominion Voting Systems and the company’s lawyers have high thresholds to meet in their defamation case against Fox News, but in terms of the political impact of their lawsuit, the revelations have already been devastating — and they somehow keep getting worse.
To briefly recap, a recent court filing presented evidence that suggested Fox News promoted bogus election claims they knew to be false, on purpose, in order to placate its audience and make money. We also learned, among other things, that News Corp. Executive Chairman Rupert Murdoch acknowledged under oath that some prominent Fox News hosts “endorsed” baseless claims the network knew to be wrong.
As part of a pretrial hearing, Dominion prepared a series of slides that referenced internal communications and testimony. Fox News redacted some pertinent details, but as NBC News reported, the judge in the case yesterday ordered that they be made public. That didn’t do the network any favors.
Ten days after the 2020 election, Fox News’ so-called Brain Room looked into conspiracy theories that Dominion Voting Systems had rigged the presidential election against Donald Trump. The fact-checking and research division of the network came back with a clear decision: Those claims were false. But the misinformation went on the air anyway.
During one deposition, a Dominion lawyer asked David Clark, Fox News’ senior vice president for weekend news and programming, “If the Brain Room had concluded that the charges were, in fact, false, they never should have been aired, correct?” The network executive replied, “Yes.”
But the claims were aired anyway.









