After President Joe Biden ended his 2024 re-election bid, Republicans did little to hide their disappointment — GOP officials were convinced the Democratic incumbent was likely to lose — and some tried to turn the development into some kind of scandal.
Sen. Tom Cotton, for example, insisted that Biden “succumbed to a coup by Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and Hollywood donors.” Pressed for an explanation, the Arkansas Republican struggled to defend his own over-the-top nonsense, but others in the party have nevertheless echoed the rhetoric.
Take Donald Trump’s running mate, for example. The Washington Post reported:
Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) tried to characterize Vice President Harris’s likelihood of being the Democratic presidential nominee as a “coup” after the party quickly coalesced behind her in the days after President Biden announced that he would not seek reelection.
“The media … for years has said the Republicans are a threat to democracy,” Vance told a Nevada audience. “They’re calling it a coronation [of Harris]. I’ve got a different word for it: I call it a coup.”
So, a few things.
First, as we discussed last week, we already have a good idea as to what a “coup” is. Merriam-Webster’s definition is as good as any: “a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics and especially the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group.”
To think this applies to an incumbent president voluntarily withdrawing from a re-election campaign is obviously bad-faith nonsense. I realize that Vance is new to all of this — his career in elected office began last year — but incumbents retire all of the time. It’s perfectly normal. When they retire at the urging of allies, it doesn’t suddenly transform into a rebellion.
Second, if Republicans like Vance and Cotton are looking for evidence of developments that actually resemble a coup, perhaps they should turn their attention to Trump’s Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol?








