After Donald Trump released a video of his unaired “60 Minutes” interview, the president found himself with a new, self-imposed problem: viewers saw Trump say it’d “be so good” if the Supreme Court destroyed the Affordable Care Act, which is a politically problematic argument, especially during a pandemic.
Pressed by CBS News’ Lesley Stahl for his replacement plan, the Republican struggled badly to answer even the most basic questions.
In last night’s presidential debate, Trump kept digging.
He began by arguing that the ACA “is in court because Obamacare is no good.” In reality, the Affordable Care Act is working well; it’s more popular than the president who hopes to destroy it, and it’s in court because a group of Republicans filed a transparently ridiculous lawsuit against it. Trump nevertheless went on to say:
“Pre-existing conditions will always stay. What I would like to do is a much better health care, much better. We’ll always protect people with pre-existing. So I’d like to terminate Obamacare, come up with a brand new, beautiful health care.”
Right off the bat, the idea that the president “will always” support protections for Americans with pre-existing conditions is absurd: Trump is right now supporting Republican litigation that intends to eliminate those protections altogether.
But taking a step further, when a president says he wants to tear down his own country’s existing health care system, he needs to do more than offer vague assurances about “a brand new, beautiful health care” system that would be “much better.” He needs to actually back that up with some kind of plan.
And that’s where Trump keeps failing. As we discussed yesterday, the Republican has spent literally years telling Americans he has a terrific health care plan, which will deliver better results at a lower cost, and this reform miracle is nearly ready for its unveiling.
It still doesn’t exist. Indeed, when the Trump White House and GOP lawmakers tried to repeal and replace the ACA in 2017, they failed spectacularly, in large part because their regressive plan was neither “beautiful” nor “better” than the existing system.








