President Joe Biden’s address to the United Nations on Wednesday focused heavily on the international coalition of countries responding to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
But it wasn’t all militaristic. The president spent a fair share of his speech at the gathering — the first in-person U.N. General Assembly in three years — discussing global food insecurity, and the potential for food shortages to worsen international conflict.
“We all know we’re already living in a climate crisis,” he said. “No one seems to doubt it after this past year.”
Biden added that “families are facing impossible choices, choosing which child to feed and wondering if they’ll survive.”
This, he said, is “the human cost of climate change,” which is “growing not lessening.”
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, one of the world’s top grain exporters, has hit food prices and highlighted the impact global conflict can have on food supply. From an American perspective, it can be easy for many of us to see helping other countries to establish and fortify their own food supplies as charity. But that’s obviously foolish. There’s a clear line between food scarcity abroad, whether that’s imposed through climate change or conflict, and food troubles — empty shelves and rising prices — in the United States.
Shortly before Biden’s speech, the White House announced it would authorize $2.9 billion in aid to help fight global food insecurity. The White House said those funds are in addition to $6.9 billion the U.S. committed to the U.N. earlier this year.








