John McEntee, the 29-year-old Republican who now leads the White House Office of Presidential Personnel, apparently had a controversial meeting last week. According to Axios, McEntee “called in White House liaisons from cabinet agencies,” and asked them to “identify political appointees across the U.S. government who are believed to be anti-Trump.”
The story described a campaign with a McCarthyite flare: officials were supposed to be on the lookout for officials who may work for the Trump administration, and may be effective in their roles, but who may be suspected of being disloyal to Donald Trump.
It now appears McEntee’s work is just one piece of a larger puzzle. The Washington Post reported over the weekend:
President Trump has instructed his White House to identify and force out officials across his administration who are not seen as sufficiently loyal, a post-impeachment escalation that administration officials say reflects a new phase of a campaign of retribution and restructuring ahead of the November election.
The article paints a portrait of an increasingly paranoid president, who has loyalists “combing through various agencies,” eager to “oust or sideline political appointees who have not proved their loyalty.”
In the wake of the president’s impeachment trial, there have been multiple reports on Trump targeting names on his “enemies list.” This latest reporting is related, but not identical: the president isn’t just content to cross names off his enemies list; he’s also eager to find new antagonists he can add to his enemies list.
Or as the Post put it, “What began as a campaign of retribution against officials who participated in the impeachment process has evolved into a full-scale effort to create an administration more fully in sync with Trump’s id and agenda.”
The New York Times had a related report over the weekend, adding, “In some of the most critical corners of the Trump administration, officials show up for work now never entirely sure who will be there by the end of the evening — themselves included.”
It’s an ostensibly professional environment — which also happens to be the executive branch of the world’s preeminent superpower — in which officials have to look over their shoulders, wondering whether they may be accused of showing insufficient loyalty to Dear Leader. The Times‘ article added, “[C]areer professionals are not the only ones in the cross hairs. Also facing scrutiny are Republican political appointees considered insufficiently committed to the president or suspected of not aggressively advancing his agenda.”









