There were several oddities about the House Oversight Committee’s Benghazi hearing last week, but one of the unanswered questions related to Chairman Darrell Issa’s (R-Calif.) choice of witnesses. Yesterday, on “Meet the Press,” this grew even more problematic.
The hearing was supposed to be about the committee getting more answers about the attack, but Issa chose not to invite former Ambassador Thomas Pickering, a veteran diplomat from the Reagan and Bush administrations, who helped oversee the independent investigation into the events in Benghazi. If the goal was to get more information, why not ask Pickering to appear?
Issa said yesterday, “Ambassador Pickering, his people and he refused to come before our committee.” Pickering, who was seated next to Issa at the time, said the far-right congressman was lying. “I said the day before the hearings, I was willing to appear to come to the very hearings that he excluded me from.”
So it would appear that Mr. Issa said something he knew to be untrue. I mention this, of course, because we’ve been told that saying something untrue on a Sunday show — deliberately or not — is deeply scandalous, and reason to keep someone from positions of power and authority. So why the congressman say Pickering “refused to come before our committee” when that’s the opposite of the truth?








