The prospect of military intervention in Syria is clearly on the minds of many Americans, and a spirited debate is underway about the wisdom on target strikes. With this in mind, President Obama not surprisingly devoted his weekly address to help make the case for his policy.
He was immediately followed by Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) who delivered the Republican Party’s weekly address on … how much the GOP hates the Affordable Care Act.
It was a little jarring. For one thing, the timing was bizarre — in the midst of an important debate over a national security crisis, the official Republican message of the week ignores the debate entirely? Of course, the GOP may not have had much of a choice, since the party doesn’t really have a foreign policy, per se, and is divided on U.S. policy in Syria.
For another, Barrasso’s message was detached from reality in ways that were hard to believe. The Wyoming senator proclaimed, “Many families are going to have real sticker shock when they see their new insurance rates — even families who get government subsidies.”
The argument came just 48 hours after we learned pretty much the opposite. Jonathan Cohn had a terrific item on this over the weekend, noting among other things that “Obamacare premiums appear lower than experts predicted.”
So why would Barrasso devote his party’s weekly address to pushing bogus rhetoric that had been debunked just days beforehand? Because of the larger context in which his remarks were delivered.
I’ve been writing quite a bit in recent months (and years, as longtime readers may recall) about the “wonk gap” between the left and right. Highlighting Barrasso’s errors, Paul Krugman picked up on the thesis in his new column.








