When it came to economic metrics and the 2012 campaign, Mitt Romney has struggled to pick a line and stick with it.
The initial line from Romney was that the unemployment rate is higher now than when President Obama took office. It was a foolish argument, which is no longer true.
The second line has been that the unemployment rate has been above 8% for four consecutive years. That’s a weak pitch — in FDR’s first term, the rate was above 17% for four consecutive years, too — and with the figure down to 8.1%, Romney’s at risk of losing his talking point.
So, it’s apparently time to move the goalposts once again.
“[A]nything near 8 percent or over 4 percent is not cause for celebration,” Romney said…. Earlier Friday, Romney said the economy should be adding half a million jobs a month, and blasted the jobs news as “terrible.”
“We should be seeing numbers in the [range of] 500,000 jobs created per month,” Romney told Fox News.
Remember, economic policy is supposed to be Romney’s strong point as a candidate.
Part of the problem here is with Romney’s wildly unrealistic benchmarks, which, if he’s elected, he’ll be unable to reach. Indeed, in the event of a Romney presidency, he just helped create the 2016 attack ads — 500,000 jobs per month and 4% unemployment is the new standard for success.
But the other concern here is historical — over the last three decades, the unemployment rate has dipped below 4% just four times out of 496 months. Each of those four months was during Bill Clinton’s presidency.









