Throughout his second term, Donald Trump’s line on the future of FEMA hasn’t left his administration with a lot of wiggle room: As far as the president is concerned, the agency’s days are numbered.
“FEMA is getting in the way of everything,” the Republican argued earlier this year, failing to explain what that meant. Trump soon after said he saw the agency as an unnecessary department that should be “TERMINATED.” Around the same time, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose Cabinet department oversees the emergency response agency, added, “We’re going to eliminate FEMA.”
But after the recent deadly flooding in Texas, the White House started hedging a bit on its plans, opening the door to an agency that might be overhauled but not necessarily “terminated.” Late last week, Noem even suggested that FEMA’s future would endure.
“What you saw happen in Texas was much more how FEMA will look in the future,” the South Dakota Republican said, as if the federal response to the Texas flooding was so impressive, it had established a model worthy of emulation going forward.
It appears that assessment has not been universally embraced within the agency. CNN reported that the head of FEMA’s Urban Search and Rescue branch resigned on Monday.








