After Rep. George Santos was indicted and arraigned last month, the New York Republican was released on $500,000 bond. A variety of questions soon followed, including lines of inquiry surrounding the congressman’s financial backers who helped cosign the bond.
Indeed, as we discussed yesterday, two weeks after his arrest, The New York Times asked the judge in his case for the names of Santos’ bond suretors to be unsealed, citing a “compelling public interest in maintaining the greatest transparency possible in these proceedings.” Soon after, other news organizations sought the same information.
Yesterday, as NBC News reported, the judge told the GOP lawmaker what he didn’t want to hear.
The judge overseeing the case against indicted Rep. George Santos agreed Tuesday to unseal the names of the people who put up the New York Republican’s $500,000 bond. U.S. Magistrate Judge Anne Shields kept her order and related filings under seal, however, to give Santos until noon Friday to appeal her decision.
This comes two days after an Associated Press report cited the congressman’s lawyer saying that Santos originally lined up three responsible cosigners as suretors, but one backed out and the other two didn’t show up to his arraignment. That forced them to make “other confidential arrangements.”
Time will tell, of course, whether Santos and his defense counsel appeal the ruling and have any success, but the stakes are surprisingly high.
In fact, Santos’ lawyer also said this week that the Republican congressman was so determined to hide the names of the bond cosigners that he would, as the AP report put it, “risk going to jail” to protect their identities.
When CNN’s Manu Raju caught up with Santos on Capitol Hill yesterday, the New Yorker seemed quite reluctant to answer questions. Asked why it’s so important to shield their identities of his financial backers, Santos would only say, “Because it is.”
George Santos, the indicted New York Republican, refused to answer questions about why he’s been shielding the identities of the people who paid for his $500,000 bond. Looking ahead, there are a few possible outcomes to consider. I have a hunch House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is rooting against that third option — because the small House Republican majority needs Santos’ vote. Watch this space. This post revises our related earlier coverage.
Steve Benen is a producer for "The Rachel Maddow Show," the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He's also the bestselling author of "Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans' War on the Recent Past."
Latest Post
Recommended
Asked him why it’s so important to shield their identities, Santos told me: “Because it is.” pic.twitter.com/PkaJBsAc8q
