About a third of the way into the vice presidential debate, the discussion turned to Springfield, Ohio — a community torn apart by a racist and false conspiracy theory promoted by both members of the Republican Party’s presidential ticket. It was against this backdrop that Sen. JD Vance, who ostensibly represents the city, referred to “millions of illegal immigrants” and parts of the country that have been “destroyed by Kamala Harris’ open border.”
The Republican senator was peddling a multi-layered lie: The border isn’t “open”; the vice president isn’t responsible for the nation’s immigration laws; and Springfield’s Haitian immigrants entered the country legally. Indeed, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democratic nominee, took the opportunity to note that his rival had “vilified a large number of people who were here legally.”
At that point, one of the debate’s moderators, CBS News’ Margaret Brennan, told viewers, “To clarify for our viewers, Springfield, Ohio, does have a large number of Haitian migrants who have legal status, temporary protected status.”
The GOP nominee was not having it. The New York Times referred to it as the debate’s “fact-checking flashpoint,” and NBC News’ report summarized it this way:
At Tuesday’s debate, things grew heated around Springfield after CBS News moderators Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan interjected to note the Haitian immigrants in Springfield have legal status before trying to move on. Vance objected, speaking over the moderators and preventing them from asking their next question.
“The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check,” the senator complained.
In reality, even that wasn’t quite true: As the Times’ report noted, CBS News executives had indicated ahead of the event “that the moderators may choose to clarify a fuzzy point if they determined it had been left unclear.”
Or put another way, Vance lied about fact-checking after having lied about immigration policy.
But the on-air clash had a larger significance. The Ohio Republican wasn’t upset because the debate moderators were wrong; he was upset because the debate moderators were telling the public the truth.
And as Vance made clear over the course of the evening, telling the truth simply wasn’t part of his debate strategy.
Much of the post-event analysis has focused on the fact that the young senator appeared polished, smooth and well-prepared for much of the debate, while Walz, who missed some opportunities, seemed nervous and at times unsteady. Those assessments are largely fair. But more important than the GOP candidate’s presentation and style was the fact that he spent much of the evening peddling an alternate reality with little resemblance to the real world.








