The class-action lawsuit calling for equal pay that was filed by all 28 members of the World Cup-winning U.S. women’s soccer team was perhaps the most powerful and provocative story involving sports and politics that we’ve seen over the last five years, and to the delight of many people across the sports world, it ended Monday when all parties settled for $24 million, $22 million of which will be split among the athletes.
None of the money gets released until a new collective bargaining agreement is signed between U.S. Soccer and the players’ union.
The remaining $2 million is to go to charities that benefit women and girl’s soccer programs and to help players with their post-retirement transitions. However, none of the money gets released until a new collective bargaining agreement is signed between U.S. Soccer and the players’ union.
Megan Rapinoe, women’s soccer biggest star and one of the five original players who filed the suit, told ESPN: “There’s no real justice in this other than this never happening again. With the settlement of the working conditions and this settlement which is contingent upon a CBA that will have equal pay going forward, there’s no other way to look at it than just a monumental win for women’s sports and women’s soccer, in particular.”
But not everyone agrees. In a post on the Sports Fan Coalition blog, former team goalkeeper and Hall of Famer Hope Solo called the decision “infuriating and heartbreaking” and took a shot at Rapinoe and Alex Morgan, perhaps the team’s second-most high-profile player. “They both know this is not a win,” Solo said. “They know it’s an easy out of a fight they were never really in.”
Solo wrote: “Read the fine print. ‘Contingent upon the negotiation of a new collective bargaining agreement.’ It doesn’t exist yet and is not guaranteed. If the players had ever been successful in negotiating an equal CBA, there would’ve been no reason to sue the federation in the first place.”








