Donald Trump isn’t the only right-wing fabulist who has learned that when you enter a courtroom, rules matter. True the Vote, a national group devoted to spreading conspiracies about voter fraud, just suffered a humiliation in a Georgia courtroom, thanks to a judge’s simple request that they — get this — provide evidence for their claims of fraud during the 2020 election and the subsequent Senate runoff.
While it’s understandable to despair at the ease with which the liars and con artists of the right’s “election integrity” movement pump fabrications into the national bloodstream, their virtually unbroken string of failures in the courts may offer some solace. At least there, the system seems to work.
To make a charge stand up legally, these voter fraud fabulists have to back it up with evidence. Again and again, they have failed to do so.
That’s because courts have rules far more strict than Rudy Giuliani’s podcast or — as Dominion’s defamation lawsuit against Fox News showed — an evening of right-wing television. To make a charge stand up legally, these voter fraud fabulists have to back it up with evidence. Again and again, they have failed to do so.
The cycle, by now, is depressingly familiar. First, groups like True the Vote spout claims of widespread fraud based on innuendo, ignorance of the law and the occasional I-know-a-guy-whose-girlfriend’s-cousin-heard-from-another-guy hearsay. Then those claims are amplified by conservative media — in this case, True the Vote’s conspiracy theories were heavily featured in the film “2000 Mules” from Dinesh D’Souza, a conservative pundit and convicted felon who was pardoned by Trump.
But though the claims may be widely believed by the devoted and the deluded, when it comes time to actually challenge the outcome of an election, they fail. In the Georgia case, True the Vote had filed a claim with the state in late 2021 alleging that the organization “spoke with several individuals regarding personal knowledge, methods, and organizations involved in ballot trafficking in Georgia.” They even said they had one anonymous individual who “admitted to personally participating and provided specific information about the ballot trafficking process.”
Those are some blockbuster allegations. So the state of Georgia opened an investigation, and asked True the Vote for evidence, including the name of this ballot trafficker so they could interview the person. Last summer, fed up with waiting for True the Vote to turn over corroboration, the Georgia attorney general asked a judge to compel the group to share its proof. Finally, in a court filing — more than two years after its initial complaint — True the Vote admitted it is unable to supply evidence for its charges.
We saw a similar series of events in the immediate aftermath of the 2020 election: All over the country, Trump’s representatives and advocates tried to get the results of the election overturned. Every time they got into court, they were unable to provide any proof of their claims. They lost over 50 such suits; in some cases, judges that Trump himself had appointed tossed them out of court.








