America’s top military adviser Martin Dempsey says sending American ground troops to combat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria isn’t out of the question, especially if President Obama’s plan to combat the terrorist group fails.
“If we reach the point where I believe our advisers should accompany Iraqi troops on attacks against specific [Islamic State] targets, I’ll recommend that to the president,” said Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in a hearing held Tuesday by the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Dempsey quickly added that his “view at this point is that this coalition is the appropriate way forward and I believe that will prove true” but “if it fails to be true and there are threats to the United States then I, of course, would go back to the president and make a recommendation that may include the use of U.S. military ground forces.”
State Department spokesperson Marie Harf said later Tuesday that “there is no intention” for any U.S. ground troops to participate in combat. Instead, they are in a “combat advisory role,” she said.
“The president has been very clear we will not have troops on the ground in combat roles, period,” Harf told reporters.
Obama has authorized airstrikes on ISIS – also known as ISIL — in Iraq and has stressed that the effort “will not involve American combat troops fighting on foreign soil.” The president has also requested that Congress approve legislation that would train and equip Syrian rebels to fight the terror group, which released a propaganda video over the weekend showing the execution of British aid worker David Cawthorne Haines—the latest gruesome attack in a troubling string of beheadings by ISIS.
The House of Representatives started debate Tuesday on the measure to arm the Syrian opposition and is expected to vote on legislation as early as Wednesday. While leaders of both parties back Obama’s strategy to target the terrorist group, some lawmakers have expressed concerns that the weapons could end up in the hands of ISIS. Others want to take stronger action and some are concerned about the U.S. getting embroiled in another war.
Obama and White House officials have escalated their outreach efforts ahead of the vote. Obama himself has made more than a dozen calls, including to House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California, and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, Democrat of Maryland, NBC News’ Frank Thorp reported.
The U.S. Central Command announced that the American military conducted five airstrikes in Iraq on Monday and Tuesday, including three strikes southwest of Baghdad. The strikes in Baghdad are the first the U.S. has taken as part of the expanded efforts to destroy ISIS. A defense official told NBC News that the airstrike Monday near Baghdad was more offensive in nature and was the result of any advance of ISIS toward the Iraqi capital. CENTCOM has launched a total of 167 airstrikes — hitting ISIS trucks, anti-aircraft artillery pieces, ground units and boats — in Iraq since the U.S. intervened on Aug. 7.
President Obama arrived in Tampa on Tuesday night in advance of his planned visit Wednesday to CENTCOM at MacDill Air Force Base, where he will be briefed on military battle plans to strike at ISIS in Iraq and possibly Syria.
White House officials have said that “several” Arab countries have committed to carrying out airstrikes on against ISIS, although officials would not identify which countries extended an offer.
Both Dempsey and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, meanwhile, faced tough questioning Tuesday from the Senate panel on Obama’s plan to “degrade and destroy” ISIS.
Hagel defended Obama’s strategy, warning, however, that the battle will not be “easy or brief.” He said the intelligence community has not detected a specific threat against the U.S., but he said if ISIS is left unchecked, the group “will directly threaten our homeland and our allies” and already has “global aspirations.”
At one point in the hearing, Republcian Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas asked Dempsey what a worst-case scenario would look like. Dempsey said a combination of radical ideology and an inequitable distribution of resources would “almost surely trigger a confrontation with Iran into which the rest of the world would be drawn into for obvious reasons.”
Separately, the committee’s top Republican, Sen. Inhofe of Oklahoma, criticized Obama, insisting he has downplayed the terrorist group’s threat to the U.S. “It will take an army to beat an army,” said Inhofe.
“I’m not advocating for an army division or combat elements on the ground. But it’s foolhardy for the Obama administration to tie its hands and so firmly rule out the possibility of air controllers and special operators on the ground to direct airstrikes and advise fighting forces. It sends the wrong message to our troops, to the enemy, and to partners,” he added.








