We don’t know yet how jurists in Colorado, Minnesota and other states will rule on Donald Trump’s ballot eligibility. But it’s becoming ever clearer that the U.S. Supreme Court will likely have the final word, stemming from one or more of these cases making its way to Washington — and whatever that word is, it’s needed soon.
Some of the latest evidence of that came Thursday in Minnesota, during arguments at the state’s Supreme Court. It was there that a lawyer raised the prospect of different states deciding the 14th Amendment issue differently. The state’s chief justice, Natalie Hudson, said that’s why we have a U.S. Supreme Court.
Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, who’s at the center of the case proceeding in her state, also noted that possibility of different outcomes in an interview with me last week.
Voters in cases across the country have been citing the U.S. Constitution’s insurrectionist ban to try and keep Trump off the presidential ballot.
Voters in cases across the country have been citing the U.S. Constitution’s insurrectionist ban to try and keep Trump off the presidential ballot.








