A bunch of judges just said Donald Trump can’t run for president?? Shouldn’t they let the voters decide???
So goes a version of the reaction to the Colorado Supreme Court ruling that has disqualified Trump from the ballot: That enforcing the 14th Amendment against him is somehow “antidemocratic.”
That criticism couldn’t be further from the truth, and it’s important to understand why: It amounts to an argument against the Constitution itself.
To be sure, there’s plenty of room for disagreement over how the amendment’s insurrection clause applies, and the U.S. Supreme Court may reach a different conclusion that lets Trump run for office in 2024. But discomfort with applying the amendment at all isn’t a legal argument — it’s a political one.
As former federal judge Michael Luttig explained when we discussed the subject last month, “it’s the conduct that gives rise to disqualification that the Constitution tells us is antidemocratic.” Luttig added: “It is the Constitution itself that provides for disqualification. So there’s no possible way that the Constitution itself can be understood as antidemocratic.”








