UPDATE (June 30, 2022, 10:07 a.m. ET): The Supreme Court issued a ruling on Thursday significantly curtailing the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulation of greenhouse gas emissions.
The Supreme Court’s upcoming decision in a climate-related case will likely threaten the very concept of a federal government.
The case, West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, concerns whether the government can impose regulations to stem climate change — but the implications extend far beyond that. The decision is expected to drop Thursday.
In reality, many government regulations are the only thing keeping our democratic society afloat.
Some quick background on the case: West Virginia’s attorney general is suing on behalf of coal companies who are arguing the federal government doesn’t have the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the Clean Power Plan, a policy put in place during the Obama administration.
Fundamentally, though, the case will effectively determine whether, according to the six conservative justices on the Supreme Court, the government has any authority to impose regulations at all. Republicans have been attacking the so-called administrative state — that is, government agencies — for decades now. These agencies have traditionally been tasked with upholding civil rights and human rights, and the GOP sees them as roadblocks impeding their anti-democratic vision for the country.
For years, they have spewed hypercapitalist propaganda downplaying government regulations as drags on the economy. And to the GOP’s credit, it’s probably been pretty successful: Many Americans will hear “regulations” are ending and think that means the end of unnecessary red tape.








