The Washington Post offered real insight into the Romney camp’s thinking on the economy today. Kevin Hassett and Glenn Hubbard, both economic advisers to Romney penned today’s op-ed, “Obama inconsistent on pace of economic recovery.” Here’s taste:
President Obama’s principal economic argument for reelection now appears to be that he has an excuse for the U.S. economy’s extremely weak recovery from the deep recession of 2007 to 2009: that recoveries after financial crises are always slow. The president said in Ohio in June, in language that has been echoed by his surrogates, that “this was not your normal recession. Throughout history, it has typically taken countries up to 10 years to recover from financial crises of this magnitude.”In other words, according to the excuse narrative, even though the Obama stimulus was brilliant and timely, it could not deliver a normal recovery because the financial crisis made that impossible.
What really sticks out their understanding and approach regarding the stimulus. In his analysis on Hassett and Hubbard’s conclusions, the always wonktastic Ezra Klein argued what failed to yield a better recovery isn’t the stimulus — it was the lack of stimulus. He writes:









