Since 2005, American gun manufacturers have been shielded from liability lawsuits thanks to a federal immunity bill called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. “It’s a historic piece of legislation,” NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre said at the time of its passage. “As of Oct. 20, [2005], the Second Amendment is probably in the best shape in this country that it’s been in decades.”
Before the gun industry secured this protection, a number of manufacturers faced suits on liability charges in which their guns were involved in illegal purchases and trafficking. Prosecutors claimed the manufacturers were negligent in their sales practices, that more could be done to lessen the risk of firearms falling into the wrong hands. The manufacturers disagreed.
The transcripts of these depositions have largely been tucked away in the archives of law firms and courthouses for the last decade. But documents recently acquired by The New York Times have disclosed some startling testimony from the leaders the gun manufacturing industry.
“I don’t even know what a gun trafficker is,” said one top executive of Taurus International, a manufacturing conglomerate that specializes in making a variety of guns.
Former Glock COO Paul Jannuzzo was asked if he would ever consider declining to sell high-capacity magazines. “Not for one half a second, no, sir,” he answered. As the Times reports, Jannuzzo “derided a suggestion that children should be denied access to the section of stores where Glock guns were sold.”








