Here we go folks. The general election campaign is only a few weeks old and the #ObamaDerangementSyndrome is emerging at Mitt Romney’s appearances.
At a Romney town hall today in Euclid, Ohio, a woman in the audience declared that President Obama is “operating outside the structure of our Constitution,” and “should be tried for treason” while asking Romney about his views on the balance between the three branches of government.
Romney conveniently ignored the woman’s suggestion that Obama “should be tried for treason” and answered by saying he would respect the different branches of government if he became president.
Here’s the complete question:
“We have a president right now that is operating outside the structure of our Constitution (applause). And I want to know, I want to know, I, I wa — yeah, I do agree he should be tried for treason — but I want to know what you’re going to be able to do to restore balance between the three branches of government and what you are going to be able to do to restore our Constitution in this country.”
“Well, as I’m sure you do, I happen to believe the Constitution was not just brilliant but probably inspired,” Romney responded. “I happen to believe the same thing about the Declaration of Independence. I would respect the different branches of government if I am fortunate enough to become president.”
Later while greeting voters after the event, Romney told reporters that that “of course” he doesn’t believe Obama should be tried for treason.
So if he didn’t agree, why didn’t stand up to the woman and tell everybody during the actual town hall like John McCain did in 2008?
“I answered the question,” Romney said. “I don’t correct all the questions that get asked of me.”
Yeah, that was the same excuse Rick Santorum offered when he allowed a woman in his audience to refer to President Obama an avowed Muslim and someone who is not legally our president. Watch the videos:








