A compelling, fact-based defense of the content of Paul Ryan’s vice-presidential acceptance speech last night is impossible. The deception was so flagrant, so thorough, so sloppy, and so unending that, as one observer on Twitter put it, Politifact probably melted down.
That left those speaking up for Ryan to make a broader, more philosophical point about the inherently slippery nature of political rhetoric. Larry Sabato, the UVa professor and pundit, led the chargeon this front:
Convo speeches are not scholarly papers w/ footnotes. They’re ALWAYS filled with exaggeration & omission.








