Donald Trump realized recently that his Russia scandal had reached the point at which outside legal representation was necessary. Finding a lawyer, however, turned out to be easier said than done: Yahoo News recently reported that the White House reached out to several major firms in D.C., and “at least four” said no.
As we discussed last week, that left the president with Marc Kasowitz, a civil litigator with no background in constitutional cases, who represented the president in a variety of lawsuits, including the fraud allegations surrounding Trump University. Kasowitz has already given indications that he may not be the best person for the job.
But there are others on the president’s legal team. Indeed, far-right attorney Jay Sekulow appeared on ABC News yesterday to defend Trump’s legal position. And if you’re wondering, “Who’s Jay Sekulow?” I’m glad you asked.
Let’s take a brief stroll down memory lane. After his failed Republican presidential bid in 1988, radical TV preacher Pat Robertson parlayed his donor list into a potent political force. The religious right movement was growing into one of the dominant factions in GOP politics, and Robertson took full advantage of his notoriety — cultivating a mini-empire featuring an activist organization (the Christian Coalition), a college (Regent University), an annual political gathering (the Christian Coalition’s “Road to Victory” conference), and a broadcast presence (the Christian Broadcasting Network).
But Robertson also wanted a legal group intended to serve as a right-wing rival to the ACLU, so he created the ACLJ — the American Center for Law and Justice — to advance the religious right’s agenda in the courts.
Jay Sekulow was the chief counsel for the radical televangelist’s legal group. Now he has a leadership role on Donald Trump’s legal team.
I don’t imagine much of the country recognizes Sekulow’s name, but for those familiar with the religious right movement, he’s a very high-profile figure, and as TPM’s Josh Marshall noted over the weekend, that makes him a curious choice to defend the president in the current circumstances.









