In the final days of the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump’s closing message urged Americans to reject Hillary Clinton, not just because she was wrong, but because her election would lead to an exhausting number of scandals.
On Nov. 2, 2016, Politico reported, “Trump predicted that Clinton’s election would bring ‘an unprecedented and protracted constitutional crisis’ because of the looming investigation and suggested Americans would not want to endure a second Clinton administration marred by scandal.”
Three days later, Trump insisted that Clinton, as president, couldn’t possibly be expected to govern — because the distraction of a federal investigation would make such an endeavor impossible.
All of this came to mind when I saw this report in the New York Times.
The [FBI searches of Michael Cohen’s office and hotel room] open a new front for the Justice Department in its scrutiny of Mr. Trump and his associates: His longtime lawyer is being investigated in Manhattan; his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, is facing scrutiny by prosecutors in Brooklyn; his campaign chairman is under indictment; his former national security adviser has pleaded guilty to lying; and a pair of former campaign aides are cooperating with [Special Counsel Robert Mueller].
Mr. Mueller, meanwhile, wants to interview Mr. Trump about possible obstruction of justice.
Well, sure, when you put it that way, it starts to look bad for the president — especially after he warned the electorate about the costs of electing a leader mired in scandal.









