At a White House event last week, Donald Trump seemed excited about “doing things militarily” along the U.S./Mexico border. “Until we can have a wall and proper security, we’re going to be guarding our border with the military,” the president said. “That’s a big step. We really haven’t done that before — certainly not very much before.”
In reality, it’s not that big a step. The Bush and Obama administration used National Guard troops along the border, and in both of those instances, illegal border crossings were higher than they are now. In fact, given the total absence of a crisis, there’s no apparent substantive reason why Trump has made this decision.
In practical terms, however, the president isn’t simply dispatching 2,000 to 4,000 National Guard troops to the border; he’s actually requesting that governors agree to his request to deploy troops. Some aren’t.
Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval, also a Republican, on Friday became one of the latest leaders to oppose the plan. His spokeswoman, Mary-Sarah Kinner, said in an email that Sandoval does not believe the mission would be “an appropriate use” of the Nevada National Guard.
Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, a Democrat, has said she would deny Trump’s request.
The news wasn’t all bad for the White House, however. Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey (R) announced plans to send about 150 Guard members this week, and Texas has agreed to send an additional 250 Guard troops, as part of an initial surge.
That’s a combined total of 400 people. What’s less clear, however, is exactly how Trump will cobble together 4,000 troops — his publicly stated goal. An Associated Press report added late last week, “New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez’s office said Friday that it had not yet deployed any Guard members. The office of California Gov. Jerry Brown did not respond to questions about whether it would deploy troops.”
I know the president wants 4,000 Guard troops along the border; I just don’t know if Trump is going to get 4,000 Guard troops along the border.









