Donald Trump traveled to McAllen, Texas, yesterday for a photo-op near the U.S./Mexico border, and as part of the public-relations display, the president examined photographs of tunnels criminals dug to smuggle guns and drugs across the border.
Time magazine picked up on the obvious point that the White House may have missed: “Neither border patrol agents nor President Trump explained how a border wall would help stop the flow of drugs through tunnels.”
The same presentation featured money seized from a suspected criminal who had overstayed a visa. How would a wall address this? It wouldn’t.
As the New York Times reported, there was a lot of this dynamic to go around.
[Trump] surrounded himself with border agents, victims of horrible crimes, a display of methamphetamine and heroin, an AK-47 and an AR-15 rifle, and a trash bag stuffed with $362,062 in cash that had been confiscated by law enforcement officials.
In his view, it all added up to a single word, “crisis,” with a lone solution, building a wall — a point he emphasized in a discussion with the crime victims, law enforcement officers and McAllen residents. […]
But there was another reality. The display of drugs, weapons and cash was mainly the product of law enforcement actions stopping criminals at international bridges, where most drugs are smuggled, and conventional ports of entry.
A giant border wall, of course, would not close international bridges or conventional ports of entry.









