A core tenet of Republican ideology in recent years is the belief that no tax should go up — on anyone, at any time, by any amount, for any reason. GOP officials’ unflinching commitment to this idea has created all kinds of governance problems, but not enough to undermine the party’s fealty to the idea.
For the first time in recent memory, however, we’re starting to see some examples of Republicans carefully inching away from the partisan principle. The New York Times reported over the holiday weekend on conservative lawmakers in Kansas, South Carolina, and Tennessee agreeing to “significant tax increases in recent weeks to meet demands for more revenue.”
This was especially notable in Kansas, where Republicans were willing to go along with Gov. Sam Brownback’s (R) radical economic experiment, before it failed so spectacularly that even many of the governor’s former allies felt they had no choice but to start undoing some of the damage.
And with many Republicans in Congress eager to make the same mistake Brownback did, the Times’ piece quoted one Kansas Republican whose perspective is worth considering.
“If there were three words I could say to Congress right now,” said Stephanie Clayton, a Republican state representative from a district in the Kansas City area, “they would be, ‘Don’t do it.’”
She criticized what she said was a desire by her party to be more faithful to the principle than to the people Republicans were elected to help. Mr. Brownback and many conservatives, she said, overpromised on the tax cuts as a “sort-of Ayn Rand utopia, a red-state model,” citing the author whose works have influenced the American libertarian movement.
“And I loved Ayn Rand when I was 18 — before I had children and figured out how the world really works,” Ms. Clayton added. “That’s not how it works, as it turns out.”
Congress would probably be a more productive place if other Republicans came to the same conclusion.









