Over the weekend, USA Today published the leaked blueprint of the White House’s comprehensive immigration reform plan, built around an eight-year pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), demonstrating the kind of devotion to serious policymaking we’ve come to expect over his brief career, immediately condemned the unfinished plan he had not yet seen.
Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, issued a statement late Saturday calling the president’s reported legislation “half-baked and seriously flawed.” He said its approval “would actually make our immigration problems worse.”
The far-right Floridian added that President Obama’s fallback plan would be “dead on arrival” if sent to Capitol Hill for consideration.
What’s far less clear, at least for now, is why Rubio rejected Obama’s outline with such ferocity.
The White House’s draft, which was circulated among government agencies that deal with immigration and border security, includes provisions that will sound very familiar to those following the larger immigration debate: undocumented immigrants would be eligible for a pathway to citizenship, but they’d be at the back of the line behind those who applied for citizenship legally. Undocumented immigration would also have to pay back taxes, pay a penalty, and learn English.
To be sure, policymakers and stakeholders can and should argue over the details, but there’s nothing in this unfinished White House plan that Republican supporters of reform should find objectionable. Indeed, Obama’s blueprint is entirely consistent with what Rubio himself has said he wants.
So why in the world did the Republican senator immediately denounce a policy outline he ostensibly agrees with? What makes Rubio think it’s a good idea to oppose his own priorities?









