At first blush, the “Religious Liberty Restoration Act” measure on the North Dakota ballot may not seem especially offensive. But the proposal, which state voters will consider tomorrow, is far more controversial than it may appear.
My friend and former colleague Joe Conn recently wrote a piece on the Measure 3 ballot initiative, which he explained has the potential to “rewrite the relationship between religion and government in North Dakota.”
In practical terms, if critics are correct, the proposal would give religious institutions the power to opt out of laws they find problematic, on issues ranging from discrimination to health care. The regional Planned Parenthood affiliate also believes Measure 3 would affect women’s reproductive health, especially emergency care.
Steven R. Morrison, a professor at the University of North Dakota School of Law, said the amendment includes “strikingly broad” language.
Morrison … said the amendment isn’t problematic in so far as it protects religious individuals whose faith-motivated conduct doesn’t interfere with the rights of others. But when religious people and institutions are protected at the expense of third parties, problems necessarily ensue.








