When the Republican Party’s domestic policy megabill — the inaptly named One Big Beautiful Bill Act — was still taking shape in May, GOP officials were determined to include a provision about investing $1,000 on behalf of every American baby born over the next four years.
They just weren’t sure what to call the policy.
The original plan said the funds would put into a “money account for growth and advancement,” which naturally led to a politically convenient acronym: “MAGA” accounts. But the party ultimately decided that was too subtle, so Republicans settled on a more direct approach and said money would go into “Trump accounts.”
The underlying idea has been around for many years — policymakers, including Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, have traditionally called them “baby bonds” — though the GOP alternative is a little different. As The Washington Monthly recently explained, “[J]ust as the shuttered Trump University was a poor facsimile of a real school, Trump Accounts are a poor copycat of the ambitious ‘baby bonds’ idea championed for decades by Republican and Democratic lawmakers. … Far from revolutionary, Trump Accounts are ineffectual, inefficient, and of little benefit to the lower-income families who most need a boost.”
As Politico reported, the White House Cabinet apparently likes them anyway:
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday framed the president’s new ‘Trump accounts’ as a transformative tool for long-term wealth building and a ‘backdoor for privatizing Social Security.’ Bessent said the new tax-deferred investment accounts, which were created by President Donald Trump’s sweeping tax law earlier this month, could be a way to boost financial literacy and young voters’ engagement in the economy.
The logic of Bessent’s perspective was difficult to follow. According to his pitch at a Brietbart event in Washington, D.C., the treasury secretary believes young people will be less likely to “want to bring down the system” — and vote for candidates such as Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee in New York City’s mayoral race — if they’re literally invested in the market.
Treasury Secretary Bessent on 'Trump Accounts': "It is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security….That's a game changer."
— The Bulwark (@thebulwark.com) 2025-07-30T18:01:50.108Z
Bessent added, “In a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security. If, all of a sudden, these accounts grow and you have in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for your retirement, that’s a game-changer, too.”
The Cabinet secretary didn’t elaborate on why, exactly, he thinks this is a “backdoor” for privatizing Social Security, or why the Trump administration sees privatizing Social Security as a worthwhile policy goal — though I’m certainly looking forward to his future comments on the subject. (The accounts included in the megabill won’t have any direct impact on Social Security benefits.)
But the quote has raised eyebrows anyway.








