On Friday afternoon, as the public got their first look at the search warrant and related materials from the FBI’s Mar-a-Lago search, one of Donald Trump’s spokespersons issued a curious written statement. Much of it was tiresome and foolish — it described the search as a “botched raid,” for example — but it included one word that stood out as notable.
Federal law enforcement, the statement said, seized “declassified” documents. The former president started pushing the same line via his Twitter-like social media platform. By Friday night, a Trump representative was on Fox News reading a newly released statement, claiming that Trump, while in office, had a “standing order“ about declassifying sensitive materials that he brought with him to the White House residence.
Over the weekend, many of the Republican’s followers embraced the new script — conveniently tossing aside competing talking points from days earlier — without pausing to appreciate just how patently absurd it was.
Right off the bat, let’s start with the most obvious problem: Trump doesn’t appear to have done what he now claims he did. NBC News reported:
Richard Immerman, a historian and an assistant deputy director of national intelligence in the Obama administration, said that, while the president has the authority to declassify documents, there’s a formal process for doing so, and there’s no indication Trump used it. “He can’t just wave a wand and say it’s declassified,” Immerman said. “There has to be a formal process. That’s the only way the system can work,” because otherwise there would be no way of knowing who could handle or see the documents.
This need not be complicated: If Trump, while in office, had declassified the materials in question, there’d be some kind of record of it. There’s a process involving multiple departments and agencies.
The former president and his team aren’t pointing to documentation from the National Security Council or the White House counsel’s office; they’re simply asserting that materials were declassified, as if we’re supposed to take their word for it.
What’s more, as The New York Times reported, there’s a disconnect between the claim and the controversy, since the relevant criminal statutes operate separately from the executive branch’s system of classifying documents.








