In recent months, as the threat of a federal criminal indictment intensified, Donald Trump’s rhetoric about special counsel Jack Smith has become increasingly hysterical.
Initially, the former president was content to label Smith a “Trump Hater” and “political hit man” who shouldn’t be “allowed” to investigate him because someone Smith is related to doesn’t like Trump. But as the investigation progressed, the Republican’s rhetorical choices evolved.
Last November, Trump labeled Smith a “fully weaponized monster.” In January, the former president went further, calling Smith a “thug” in a “mental state of derangement” who “may very well turn out to be a criminal.” A month later, he condemned the special counsel as a “mad dog psycho.”
The former president has also accused Smith of overseeing “a Gestapo type operation,” as well as being an “animal” and a “lunatic.”
In the middle of the night on Saturday, Trump broke new ground, arguing by way of his social media platform that Smith is engaged in a “treasonous quest.” (The former president has spent years throwing around the word “treason,” which he seems to think means “stuff Trump doesn’t like.”)
And why, pray tell, did the Republican throw this particular tantrum? We’ll probably never know for sure, though it probably doesn’t help that the special counsel’s office is reportedly taking a closer look at Trump’s foreign business deals. The New York Times reported overnight:
Federal prosecutors overseeing the investigation into former President Donald J. Trump’s handling of classified documents have issued a subpoena for information about Mr. Trump’s business dealings in foreign countries since he took office, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The Times’ report, which has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, added that the subpoena “suggests that investigators have cast a wider net than previously understood as they scrutinize whether he broke the law in taking sensitive government materials with him upon leaving the White House and then not fully complying with demands for their return.”








