By any fair measure, the person responsible for Sen. Tommy Tuberville’s unprecedented blockade is Sen. Tommy Tuberville. No one told the Alabama Republican he had to launch this dangerous initiative six months ago, and the right-wing senator can end the fiasco at any time.
It’s why, as regular readers know, the GOP lawmaker has been condemned by military leaders. And every living former Defense secretary. And retired military leaders. And veterans. And congressional Democrats. And the White House. And military spouses.
But it was against this backdrop that some Senate Republicans came up with a new idea last week. As NBC News reported, the
As Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., keeps hundreds of military promotions in limbo for a sixth straight month, his Republican colleagues are trying to deflect criticism by pointing the finger at a familiar GOP foe: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. “I think the majority leader should take the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff nomination to the floor as we do our top Cabinet officials,” Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee, said in an interview.
Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas added that “this is entirely within Sen. Schumer’s control.”
There have been some periodic references to this argument in recent months. In July, for example, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell press secretary said online, “Did Democrats forget that they’re in the majority and control the floor?”
Even Tuberville himself suggested this past weekend that he’s not entirely to blame for undermining his own country’s military because the Democratic majority technically have the authority to confirm the nominees on which he’s imposed Senate holds.
At first blush, some might be tempted to think Republicans have a point. Under Senate rules, one member can’t unilaterally impose permanent blockades on nominees, effectively vetoing the will of the other 99 senators forever. In theory, if Schumer and Democratic leaders wanted to bring up each of the pending armed forces nominees, one at a time, and hold individual confirmation votes, that could happen.
But in practice, that’s simply not how the Senate is set up to function. In this instance, we’re talking about uncontroversial military nominees who would ordinarily be approved in a group by unanimous consent. It would take minutes. As a recent Washington Post editorial explained, “Holds cannot ultimately stop confirmations, but breaking through them requires significant and valuable Senate floor time.”
How much significant and valuable Senate floor time? As it turns out, Senate Armed Services Chairman Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat, asked the Congressional Research Service to find out. As CNN reported, Congress’ in-house think tank crunched the numbers and came up with the answer.








