In late April, as much of the public started having access to Covid-19 vaccines, Republican Sen. Ron Johnson raised predictable concerns. “What’s the point,” the Wisconsin senator asked, of trying to get the public vaccinated during a pandemic?
In late December, Johnson’s still confused.
During a Fox News appearance this week, the Republican lawmaker called the vaccines “divisive” — which apparently means many on the right don’t like them — before sharing these words of wisdom:
“Listen, we all hoped and prayed the vaccines would be 100 percent effective, 100 percent safe, but they’re not. We now know that fully vaccinated individuals can catch Covid, they can transmit Covid. So what’s the point?”
The point, of course, is that safe, free, and effective vaccines offer protections against a dangerous virus that’s already killed over 800,000 Americans. Yes, there are breakthrough infections, but those who are protected are vastly more likely to avoid getting seriously ill, needing hospital care, and/or dying.
I can appreciate why some aspects of epidemiology can be complex, but this isn’t one of them. The point of vaccines during a pandemic is pretty basic stuff. An adult in a position of authority — who actually led the Senate committee responsible for domestic security policy for six long years — shouldn’t find it confusing.
That’s especially true now. To struggle with the basics at the start of a pandemic is unfortunate, but to remain confused about basic details nearly two years later starts to look like willful ignorance.
Johnson’s question seems rooted in the idea that if a form of protection doesn’t offer a 100 percent guarantee of success, then it’s worthless. That’s not how reality works. Birth control isn’t 100 percent effective, but it’s still a responsible thing to take advantage of to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
Similarly, seat belts aren’t 100 percent effective in saving lives in serious car accidents, but that doesn’t mean they’re useless. Your odds of surviving a crash are vastly improved if you buckle up.
It matters that Johnson finds this baffling, but even more important is the fact that some of the Fox News viewers who saw the senator’s on-air comments may not realize how oblivious he is to basic information.
Indeed, the Wisconsin Republican has been a uniquely unconstructive voice throughout the public health conversation. The New York Times noted in the spring that Johnson “has become the Republican Party’s foremost amplifier of conspiracy theories and disinformation now that Donald Trump himself is banned from social media.”
Unfortunately, we’re routinely reminded that the GOP senator has invested an unnerving amount of effort into proving the analysis right — as evidenced by his recent assertion that people should use mouthwash as a coronavirus treatment.
Listen, we all hoped and prayed that mouthwash would be 100 percent effective, but it’s not. We now know that individuals who use mouthwash can catch Covid, they can transmit Covid. So what’s the point?
All joking aside, this dovetails with the larger significance of Johnson’s unfortunate comments: The senator has been eager to recommend all kinds of medicinal responses to Covid-19, except the readily available life-saving vaccines.
The Wisconsin Republican has touted hydroxychloroquine, despite its ineffectiveness. He’s pushed ivermectin, despite its ineffectiveness. YouTube found it necessary to suspend the senator’s account in June because of his videos filled with misinformation about treatments.








