When President Joe Biden announced that he was ending his re-election bid, he specifically referenced his eagerness to do the job he was elected to do for the next six months. “I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term,” the Democratic incumbent said in a written statement.
The news, of course, has touched off a multifaceted process, but it will also generate a related question from his Republican critics: “Shouldn’t Biden step down now, rather than January?”
Sen. JD Vance, his party’s vice presidential nominee, made this pitch via social media just yesterday, ahead of Biden’s announcement:
“Everyone calling on Joe Biden to *stop running* without also calling on him to resign the presidency is engaged in an absurd level of cynicism. If you can’t run, you can’t serve. He should resign now.”
This coincided with an Axios report, which added that Republicans are “laying the groundwork to pressure him to resign from office.”
I don’t doubt that voters will hear this argument quite a bit in the very near future, and it might even have some superficial appeal to casual observers. If Biden isn’t up to seeking the presidency, is it unreasonable to think he isn’t up to doing the job in the coming months?
The closer one looks, however, the more problematic this argument becomes.
First, few seriously believe that the president is incapable of performing his duties between now and January.
Second, the “if you can’t run, you can’t serve” argument is plainly wrong. Indeed, as Vance probably knows, plenty of members of Congress, including several of his Senate colleagues from both parties, have announced that they’re stepping down at the end of their current term. This is routine, and it doesn’t mean they have to resign from Capitol Hill.








