The process of electing a House speaker — usually, one of Congress’ easiest and most straightforward tasks — came to a merciful end in the early hours of Saturday morning, at which point many members expressed relief. Their chaotic crisis, unrivaled since the mid-19th century, was over and the new Republican majority in the chamber could finally put this embarrassment behind them.
That collective exhale was understandable. It was also misplaced. The election of Kevin McCarthy as speaker doesn’t represent the end of the chaos; it marks the beginning of the chaos. This New York Times report summarized the landscape nicely:
Representative Kevin McCarthy’s historically long slog to become speaker of the House has made one thing abundantly clear: The United States should brace for the likelihood of a Congress in perpetual disarray for the next two years.
McCarthy’s ascension closes an unfortunate chapter for the new House GOP majority, but while the dramatic chapter was memorable and historic, it was also brief. The rest of the story is likely to be considerably worse.
Before McCarthy prevailed, the House Republican conference had a small advantage in the chamber. It had a radicalized faction, overtly hostile toward compromise. It had weak and directionless leaders. It looked like a divided, post-policy party, lacking anything resembling a serious governing agenda.
After McCarthy prevailed, the House Republican conference looked exactly the same as it did before early Saturday’s vote.
Mockery of the circumstances might be satisfying, but it overlooks the significance of where the institution finds itself as the new Congress begins in earnest. As the Times’ report added, the prolonged fight over the speaker’s gavel has “left little doubt that Congress as an entity would struggle to carry out even its most basic duties in the coming two years, such as funding the government, including the military, or avoiding a catastrophic federal debt default.”
If House Republicans needed 15 ballots and back-room deals to elect a speaker, how realistic is it to think this ungovernable bunch will approve a budget? Or appropriations bills? Or a farm bill? Or other must-pass legislation that wasn’t much of a problem when Democrats were in charge?








