The FBI raid on Michael Cohen’s office and hotel room yesterday was, at a minimum, unusual. It’s not often when a sitting president’s personal attorney is the target of federal law enforcement like this.
But as part of a larger tantrum, Donald Trump insisted this morning, “Attorney–client privilege is dead!” As NBC News explained this morning, that’s plainly wrong.
The privilege is not dead. It’s just that that the privilege alone won’t prevent the issuance of a search warrant for documents in an attorney’s office.
Of course, the privilege between an attorney like Cohen and his clients may be lost if the “crime-fraud exception” applies. The purpose of this exception is to assure that the secrecy between lawyer and client does not extend to obtaining advice in furtherance of contemplated or ongoing criminal or fraudulent conduct.
It is not enough for the government to just show that these privileged communications between Cohen and a client might provide evidence of a crime. Rather, the communication itself must have been in furtherance of, and intended to facilitate the crime, in order to strip these communications of the protections of privilege.
Or as the Wall Street Journal reported, attorney-client privilege “is intended to allow lawyers to give robust legal advice without worrying about incriminating a client. But attorney-client information may not be protected if the communications were in service of an illegal act.” (Rachel also explored this in some detail last night with Tom Winter, an NBC News investigative reporter.)









