A month ago today, during one of only a few conversations with Democratic congressional leaders about the government shutdown, Donald Trump began the meeting with “a 15-minute profanity-laced rant about impeachment.”
No one could say with confidence what prompted the tirade — the threat of impeachment wasn’t the point of the meeting, and no one had brought up the subject before the president did — but Trump’s harangue was emblematic of his preoccupation with the subject.
The Republican’s argument against impeachment, however, still needs some work.
President Trump says that the “only way” Democrats could possibly win in 2020 is to “bring out the artificial way of impeachment.” But in an exclusive interview with “Face the Nation” moderator Margaret Brennan, the president defended his leadership of the country, saying “you can’t impeach somebody for doing the best job of any president, in the history of our country, for the first two years.”
There are quite a few problems with this, but let’s focus on the two most obvious concerns.
The first is Trump’s apparent confusion about the nature of the process. In his mind, if a president is doing a great job, he or she “can’t” be impeached. In other words, he’s convinced that impeachment is reserved for bad and unaccomplished presidents.
That’s not how any of this works. Successful presidents can commit high crimes; woeful presidents can be innocent of any wrongdoing. We’re talking about two tracks that do not intersect.
The second is that Trump has an oddly misplaced confidence about how awesome his awesomeness has been.









