Twice this week, police have shown up on the doorstep of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. She says she’s a victim of “swatting.” I say she’s the beneficiary of yet another news cycle in which she gets to be in the spotlight.
When I first heard Thursday that Greene had been swatted for a second time in as many days, I was astounded. It’s mostly been right-wingers who’ve employed the tactic of calling emergency lines with false stories of horrible violence taking place at the residences of unsuspecting victims. Such calls are meant to cause swarms of heavily armed officers to descend on the locations. The hoax typically frightens the targets out of their skin, but it has also resulted in injuries or deaths.
Swatting is a trolling tactic with no upside and no moral high ground.
It seemed wild that progressives would pull such a stunt against even someone whose stances are as heinous as Greene’s. I’m not one of those people who thinks, say, protesting a restaurant where a Supreme Court justice is dining is outré — but swatting is a trolling tactic with no upside and no moral high ground. Just last week, she introduced legislation that would ban gender-affirming care for minors around the country. According to the Rome Police Department, the person who called Tuesday night later called back to claim the report was a response to Greene’s anti-trans politics.
That makes little sense from both a tactical and a strategic level. As far as the former goes, it’s not clear what the goal the twin incidents would be other than to harass or frighten Greene at her home. Nothing about these false reports seems likely to strike fear into Greene’s heart or cause her to change her ways. It’s a moment of self-gratification for whoever has called in these false alarms and maybe a chuckle for their supporters on Twitter.
Strategically, swatting isn’t exactly a tool that speaks to left-wing goals and values. The whole point of calling in a SWAT team to harass a political opponent or a hapless celebrity is the hypermilitarized way these teams operate. Despite a lack of valid threats that require such overwhelming force, far too many communities around the country have spent millions needlessly building up SWAT teams that use overly aggressive methods. It defies sense to appropriate that absurd fetishization of violence in pursuit of progressive aims.








