On Monday’s NOW with Alex Wagner, the panel discussed Edward Snowden’s latest press conference in Russia and debated who was more radical–Snowden for leaking NSA secrets, or the government for expanding its surveillance program.
Alex referred to a recent column by The Atlantic’s Conor Friedersdorf, who wrote that while Snowden and Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald are frequently painted as the radicals in the current debate over NSA surveillance, “the establishment’s policies have implications far more radical than the most strident voices opposing them.”
She pointed to the secretive FISA court, which, according to The New York Times has “quietly become almost a parallel Supreme Court” and which, according to The Wall Street Journal, has turned down just 11 of 33,900 government surveillance requests in its 33-year history.
Slate’s Matthew Yglesias weighed in, saying, “They’ve sort of pushed him into becoming an international fugitive and it hasn’t been good for anyone.”
“They say they welcome this debate about privacy, they are having the debate now but it’s being treated as this very extreme, criminal action and it’s led to very negative consequences when we could have had a debate,” he added.








