WASHINGTON — Claire McCaskill came to the Senate gallery not to argue, but to rail. The Missouri senator stood in the nearly empty gallery at just after 11:00 Thursday morning. Before she spoke, other members of the Senate stated their case for or against Loretta Lynch, President Obama’s nominee to succeed Eric Holder as attorney general. During his allotted time, Republican Sen. Ted Cruz repeatedly denounced Lynch as “lawless” for her refusal to denounce the president’s policies, particularly on immigration. Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Diane Feinstein called her “an uncommon nominee for an uncommon time” who deserves, on merit, to be approved unanimously.
Lynch was ultimately approved by the Senate in a 56-43 vote just before 2:00 in the afternoon, after a wait longer than all but two people ever nominated to be attorney general. The final tally came complete with a surprise “aye” vote from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell — one last flourish after more than 160 days of waiting and an unprecedented filibuster.
RELATED: GOP staying quiet on Lynch confirmation?
The vote, and an earlier cloture motion, came after Democrats and Republicans reached an agreement on a human trafficking bill that Democrats have called irrelevant to Lynch’s nomination, since the Senate has routinely moved legislative and executive matters through the body at the same time. New York Sen. Chuck Schumer characterized the belated deal in a press conference after the cloture vote as the final act in a disingenuous ruse by Republicans to stall Lynch’s nomination. Ranking judiciary committee member Pat Leahy, a Democrat from Vermont, said the Lynch delay did not even stack up as payback for the treatment of George W. Bush’s nominees, since by this time in Bush’s second term, the then-Democratic controlled Senate had moved 15 judicial picks through — as compared to the current GOP majority’s two.
But it was McCaskill who spoke to the raw emotion of the Lynch delay.
%E2%80%9CThis%20is%20about%20the%20American%20dream.%20This%20woman%20is%20the%20embodiment%20of%20the%20American%20dream.%E2%80%9D’
“This should be a happy day for America,” she said in her opening remarks on the Senate floor ahead of the vote to end the filibuster. “This is about the American dream. This woman is the embodiment of the American dream.”
“Instead, I’m depressed,” she continued, calling the entire saga, “politics at its ugliest.”
“Republicans are saying it doesn’t matter if you’re qualified,” the Missouri senator said. “You must disagree with the president who nominated you. … [Republican senators] must vote against the cabinet nominee of the duly elected president of the United States unless she disagrees with the duly elected president of the United States.” It’s a “new requirement” of cabinet nominees, invented in the Obama era, that McCaskill termed an “affront to the notion of ‘advise and consent’” and that she described as “disgusting.”
In the end, the Lynch nomination will be remembered more for what it has said about Senate Republicans’ attitude toward Barack Obama than for what it says about Lynch, who has twice been easily confirmed by the Senate to be the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York and who even Republicans have long conceded is eminently qualified for the job.
RELATED: Senate confirms Loretta Lynch as attorney general after historic delay
As Cruz demonstrated on Thursday, it is Republican distaste for Obama’s presidency — most recently and acutely over immigration but dating to the first days of the administration — that ultimately stalled Lynch’s historic march to the head of the Justice Department. Holder, Cruz said in his speech before the cloture vote, has “refused to impose any limits on the president, and we can expect more of the same” from Lynch. The only difference, the firebrand Texas senator said, was that Holder waited until he was in office to flaunt his “lawlessness,” while by refusing to denounce President Obama’s immigration actions, Lynch didn’t even wait until the Justice Department drapes were measured.
The dog whistles to the Republican base were clear. But there was another base that has been listening too: African-American women.
Loretta Lynch and black women
Black women have since 2008 been Obama’s most loyal base, and Lynch is the first full fruit of their devotion. Black women voted overwhelmingly for the president, giving him 96% of their votes in 2008 and 2012 and boosting their turnout by 5.1% in 2008 as compared to 2004. They posted the highest voter turnout of any population group in both elections.
Lynch%20grew%20up%20to%20prosecute%20terrorists%20and%20corrupt%20politicians%20but%20also%20brutal%20police%20officers%20in%20New%20York%20City%2C%20including%20the%20cops%20who%20tortured%20Amadou%20Diallo%20inside%20an%20NYPD%20precinct%20in%201997.%20′
And yet the administration made history early on by nominating Latina and Jewish women to the Supreme Court (Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan), and by appointing black men to high-ranking offices, including Holder, as well as Jeh Johnson, who heads the Department of Homeland Security. There are, to be sure, powerful black women in the Obama administration: National security adviser Susan Rice (whose nomination to succeed Hillary Clinton as secretary of state was met by such vehement attacks from Republicans like John McCain over the Benghazi affair that she ultimately withdrew from consideration), and Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s senior adviser and perhaps the single most influential member of the White House team. But there is a special salience to Lynch’s elevation to the post of chief law enforcement official in the country.
Lynch is a daughter of the South; a Greensboro, North Carolina, native who climbed the academic ladder to make her way to Harvard University, where she co-founded the school’s chapter of the Delta Sigma Theta sorority with Eric Holder’s future wife, Sharon Malone — whose sister happened to have been one of the two black students barred at the University of Alabama’s doorstep by then-Gov. George Wallace.








