MILFORD, New Hampshire – Republican Rand Paul on Wednesday defended his foreign policy views following a nationally televised interview where he pushed back on suggestions he had shifted on issues like aid to Israel and whether Iran poses a threat to the United States.
Reporters pressed the Kentucky senator on foreign affairs on his first visit to New Hampshire as an official contender for the 2016 GOP nomination. The 52-year old senator formally entered the field Tuesday.
But Paul’s rally in the nation’s first primary state was overshadowed by an appearance on NBC’s “Today Show” Wednesday morning, where he appeared to grow defensive when host Savannah Guthrie pointed out inconsistencies in his positions, including his views on an agreement struck with Iran that would curtail its nuclear program.
“Why don’t we let me explain instead of talking over me, okay?” Paul told Guthrie. “Before we go through a litany of things you say I’ve changed on, why don’t you ask me a question: Have I changed my opinion?”
Paul, a tea party favorite, has been trying to straddle the libertarian leanings of his father, former Rep. Ron Paul, with more muscular foreign policy positions espoused by many Republican voters and the GOP establishment broadly. Many libertarians, who form Ron Paul’s passionate voter base and whose energy the younger Paul hopes to harness for his own campaign, oppose foreign aid and want to see a much smaller U.S. military footprint overseas.
RELATED: Rand Paul on Iran nuclear deal: ‘I’m going to keep an open mind’
Paul, who is staunchly anti-abortion, also faced scrutiny after an interview in which he seemed to hedge on whether there should be exceptions to a full ban on pregnancy termination. “The thing is about abortion — and about a lot of things — is that I think people get tied up in all these details of, sort of, you’re this or this or that, or you’re hard and fast (on) one thing or the other,” he told The Associated Press.
At a press conference, Paul was challenged on his foreign policy views–specifically a more bellicose tone toward Iran, whom Paul once insisted did not pose a threat to the U.S. “I would say to those who want to criticize me, one, they have to tell the truth. And I don’t believe those who have started so hard are into truth telling,” Paul said. “But my position has been pretty clear on Iran. My position is I voted for sanctions on Iran. I think Iran is a threat. And I think that having a nuclear weapon would be potentially a disaster for the world.”
Pressed again to clarify, Paul said, “Let’s get rid of potentially. It’s just a slip of the word. Not potentially, is definitely a danger. It has always been a danger and it’s always been something I oppose and would continue to oppose.”
Paul antagonists have signaled they won’t allow his shifting views to go unnoticed. A new web video released by the Foundation for a Secure and Prosperous America uses a quote from Paul saying, “Our national security is not threatened by Iran having one nuclear weapon.”








