Officials in Erie County, N.Y., were forced to cut the days it runs a free transportation program in poor and rural communities, leaving countless elderly and disabled residents stranded.
In Denver and Jacksonville, Fla., road and water projects have fallen into limbo, while city administrators in Salt Lake City, Utah, say the waiting list for families seeking housing assistance has grown from a two-year wait to five years.
And in Baltimore a heralded adult literacy program that helps nearly a thousand low-income city residents learn to read each year and get their GEDs has had to lay off staff and eliminate some of its most successful programs.
“When people line up at your door to try to register for a class, all you can do is say sorry,” Shirley Bigley-LaMotte, the CEO of Baltimore Reads, told msnbc.com.
For cities and rural towns across the country, as well as nonprofits like Baltimore Reads, officials are struggling to maintain programs offered to low- and moderate-income residents that for decades were funded through one of the most popular bipartisan federal grant programs. Roughly 1,200 communities each year receive Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), in which the federal government funnels billions of dollars directly to cities, bypassing state government bureaucracy and allowing vast leeway in the way the dollars are spent.
BUDGET CUTS STACK UP YEAR BY YEAR
Year-by-year congressional funding for the program has shrunk. CDBG funding last year shriveled to $2.9 billion, its lowest in the programs nearly four-decade history, down a full billion from where it was just two years ago.
Now many local officials across the country fear further cuts could be likely as President Obama and congressional Republicans haggle over a budget deal to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff,” at which time more than a trillion dollars of automatic cuts in federal spending would be enacted on Jan. 1.
If a deal isn’t hammered out, cities expect to lose about 8.2% of their CDBG funding, compounding the programs already shriveling funding. The U.S. Conference of Mayors estimates that further reductions to the program could siphon $242 million from city budgets.
But even if a deal is reached and the cliff is avoided, further deficit reduction measures could mean deeper cuts to CDBG funding, analysts say, and communities nationwide could find funding for many of their prized housing and social programs gutted.
“There’s real fear and uncertainty,” said Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, who said the city has used CDBG funding to raze and rehab some of the city’s more than 16,000 abandoned houses and for job training programs. “More cuts would mean that there’s going to be a reduction in the number of people that we are able to provide job training to. We are trying to grow out of the great recession. We should be trying to do more not less.”
Last year, the city received about 30% less in CDBG funding than it did two years ago.
While CDBG funding is typically a small slice of any city’s budget, the funding covers vital services that include housing assistance and foreclosure prevention programs, after-school enrichment programs, crime prevention, and public works projects. Among the two dozen or so stipulations of the program are that the funds be used to address housing, infrastructure, and social needs in low and moderate income communities.
If any city has cause for alarm it’s Baltimore. The city has a glut of abandoned houses, a perpetually dwindling tax base, a stubbornly high unemployment rate of more than 10%, and has consistently ranked among the most dangerous American cities. The city’s population has also been cursed by a laundry list of health and social ills, including a staggering HIV/AIDS rate.
The city has used some CDBG money for one of Rawlings-Blake’s hallmark initiatives, Vacants to Values, a two-year-old program that targets blighted neighborhoods for reinvestment through stronger code enforcement, the streamlined sale of vacant city-owned property, and incentives for homebuyers and developers.
Analysts say vacancies seed blight and crime, further destabilizing already fragile communities found in many post-industrial cities such as Baltimore.
According to city officials, property sales have increased 500% since 2010, from 100 to 524 in the 2012 fiscal year. About $23 million has been raised through citations issued to vacant building owners, and the city has sold 90% of city-owned property in so-called “development clusters.”
“What [CDBG] money allows us to do is ensure that the least of us, the most vulnerable of us, have resources to retool themselves,” Mayor Rawlings-Blake said.
A recent report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office noted a dramatic spike in the number of American vacant properties, from about 7 million in 2000 to 10 million today.
“With sustained high foreclosure and unemployment rates and further declining home values, local officials said that continued, flexible CDBG funding would help them maintain efforts to address vacant properties in their areas,” the report noted.
Baltimore received about $18 million in CDBG funding last fiscal year, much of it going to nonprofits, the city’s housing assistance programs, and to organizations involved in neighborhood revitalization.
“People will feel the difference,” said Steve Janes, the city’s assistant commissioner for research.
Janes said about 20 years ago the city would receive an average of about $30 million. Much of the funding back then was used for capital development projects. During the 1970s and 80s, as Baltimore began to decay both socially and structurally, there was a shift to funding more of the city’s emerging large nonprofits. By 2000, federal funding started to creep downward, Janes said.
“We don’t know that sequestration is going to take place,” said Janes of the automatic cuts that will take place if a budget deal isn’t reached. “But I think what it means, if it happens, is there will be a diminished number of people receiving job training, fewer low-income kids taking part in educational and recreational programs, more reductions in the workforce. City governments and the nonprofits are going to be laying people off.”
Critics of the CDBG program say the element of the program that has made it a favorite among mayors and other local officials–the program’s flexibility–allows for misuse, fraud, and waste. There have been a number of indictments related to the grants, and over the years, federal investigators have uncovered streams of squandered funds on foolish projects and gifts.
But city leaders in Baltimore and elsewhere say CDBG funding is critical in communities hard-hit by the recession, by the loss of jobs, and other infrastructure funding.
Last month, more than a dozen members of the U.S. Conference of Mayors met with members of Congress and Vice President Joe Biden to lobby for a budget deal to avoid the cliff and against further cuts to the block grant program.
“Mayors have been taking a balanced approach, including spending cuts, for years. Washington needs to do the same,” Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak told National Journal after a meeting with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. “But they can’t do it in a way that makes them feel that the job is done by shifting dollars back to local property tax payers.”
Rybak added: “We have been making massive cuts to those [CDBG] programs for years. We have been compromising and understand that point… We will get upset when others who have gotten off, especially those in the very top end, [don’t] have to carry their fair share.”
IMPACT FELT IN POORER, MINORITY COMMUNITIES
Across the country, local officials have had to chip away at programs they say were possible because of the CDBG funding and the wide discretion they had in using it.
“We are talking about roads, bridges; we are talking about people actually going to work” to build them, Mayor Alvin Brown of Jacksonville, Fla., told Bloomberg Businessweek.
“This is a meat-ax approach,” Kerry Bate, director of housing opportunities for the Salt Lake County Housing Authority, in Utah, told a local newspaper. “My biggest concern is that we have a lot of people in very fragile housing situations.”









