MANCHESTER, New Hampshire — With several candidates facing make-or-break votes in New Hampshire, Saturday’s debate was filled with fireworks. The biggest one landed right on top of Marco Rubio early in the night and made for the most dramatic and talked-about moment. Here are four takeaways from what could prove to be the most important Republican debate yet.
Christie gets the best of Rubio
Candidates have attacked Rubio plenty in the past over his lack of experience, missed votes, and shifting positions, but the Florida senator has rebutted them effectively at every turn with disciplined, carefully planned, perfectly delivered responses. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s innovation was to break the fourth wall and tell the audience that Rubio’s smooth answers were themselves a dangerous liability.
The setup came in an exchange over legislative versus executive experience. Christie argued Obama’s limited résumé mirrored Rubio’s own.
RELATED: Jeb Bush says he would back preemptive strike on North Korea
“Let’s dispel with this fiction that Barack Obama doesn’t know what he’s doing,” Rubio said. “He knows exactly what he’s doing.”
That’s when the fun began.
“That’s what Washington, D.C., does: The drive-by shot at the beginning with incorrect and incomplete information and then the memorized 25-second speech,” Christie said. Rubio, walking right into a trap, responded by doing exactly what Christie predicted — he attacked him over his handling of a recent snowstorm then repeated the same talking point again: “This notion that Barack Obama doesn’t know what he’s doing is just not true. He knows exactly what he’s doing.”
Christie could barely contain his glee. “There it is! There it is! The memorized 25-second speech!” he said as Rubio tried to press on with his point.
It was a brutal moment that hung over all of Rubio’s subsequent answers, which improved throughout the night but also included more variations on the same line about Obama’s competence and intentions. It’s also exactly the sort of attack one could imagine Hillary Clinton, whose biggest strength is her policy depth, leveling in a general election debate. For a candidate whose biggest argument is electability, that’s a troubling idea to have floating around Rubio.
The governors’ last stand
Christie’s motive for going after Rubio was obvious. He, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, and Ohio Gov. John Kasich all are on the verge of being swept out of the race if Rubio performs strongly on Tuesday and consolidates the so-called “establishment” lane.
With their backs to the wall, the three governors entered into a non-aggression pact. Kasich and Christie lightly argued about their respective job records, but then Christie even went out of his way to praise his rival Kasich, saying he said did “a very good job” as governor.
RELATED: Rubio said Clinton supports abortion on baby’s due date. True?
This détente freed up Kasich to talk about his upbeat message of bipartisan cooperation, Christie to keep the heat on Rubio, and Bush to tangle with Trump uninterrupted over eminent domain. All three likely left the debate feeling good.
The good news for Rubio is that if he can just make it past Tuesday with a decent second place showing, he might never have to face those three in a debate ever again.
“Every other campaign said before this debate started that they had one singular goal tonight, which was to take out Marco Rubio,” Rubio strategist Todd Harris told reporters. “They threw their best shots and they didn’t do it.”








