First Read is a morning briefing from Meet the Press and the NBC Political Unit on the day’s most important political stories and why they matter.
The Democratic race isn’t as close as you think it is
Bernie Sanders just won Oregon and almost carried Kentucky. His campaign is “willing to do some harm” to Hillary Clinton to try to win California next month, the New York Times writes. And they’re hoping to take their fight all of the way to July’s Democratic convention in Philadelphia. But here’s the one little problem with that strategy: The Clinton-vs.-Sanders race really isn’t that close — certainly not as close as it was in 2008 between Barack Obama and Clinton. Back then, after the primary season had concluded, Obama led Clinton by about 120 pledged delegates. But Clinton’s current pledged-delegate lead over Sanders is more than TWICE that amount. What’s more, while Obama and Clinton largely split the Democratic superdelegates in ’08, Clinton has an enormous 527-39 advantage here, bringing her overall lead over Sanders to 765. (Note: The superdelegates have never changed the pledged-delegate outcome since their creation.) And in terms of popular vote, Clinton leads Sanders, 13.2 million votes to 10.2 million. Here’s the current delegate math after more delegates were allocated in Kentucky and Oregon:
In pledged delegates, Clinton currently holds a lead of 277 delegates
- Clinton 1,771 (54%)
- Sanders 1,494 (46%)
Clinton must win 32% of remaining pledged delegates to get a majority in pledged delegates
Sanders must win 68% of remaining pledged delegates to get a majority in pledged delegates
In overall delegates (pledged + super), Clinton holds an overall lead of 765 delegates
Clinton must win 9% of remaining delegates to reach 2,383 magic number
Sanders must win 91% of remaining delegates to reach 2,383 magic number
A reminder: Clinton essentially put Dem contest out of reach back in March
But how can that math be right when it seems that Sanders has won as many Election Nights as Clinton has, especially in the past month? Here’s the answer: Clinton’s biggest wins — her delegate hauls that effectively put the contest out of reach back in March — were early poll-closing calls on dates with multiple primaries, so they didn’t get that much attention at the time.
- On March 1, Clinton beat Sanders in Georgia, 71%-28%,netting a gain of 44 delegates (73-29)
- On March 1, Clinton beat Sanders in Texas, 65%-33%, netting 72 delegates (147-75)
- On March 15, Clinton beat Sanders in Florida, 64%-33%, netting 68 delegates (141-73)
- On April 19, Clinton beat Sanders in New York, 58%-42%, netting 31 delegates (139-108)
- On April 26, Clinton beat Sanders in Maryland, 63%-33%, netting 27 delegates (61-34)
Add up those five results, and that’s a net gain of 242 delegates — making up most of Clinton’s current 277 pledged-delegate lead. By contrast, Sanders’ recent victories in Indiana (+5 gain in delegates), West Virginia (+7), and Oregon (+6 so far) produced a smaller combined gain (+19) than what Clinton got out of Maryland by itself (+27), as the New York Times’ Nate Cohn has observed. Sanders’ biggest delegate haul was out of Washington state (+47), but he hasn’t had enough of those kind of results to undo what Clinton accomplished on March 1 and March 15. Oh, and what do those five big Clinton victories above have in common? They’re states with significant minority populations.
Chuck Todd
Chuck Todd is NBC News' chief political analyst and the former moderator of "Meet The Press."
Carrie Dann
Mark Murray









