Because the science of healthy eating has changed since the Food and Drug Administration wrote the current guidelines in the 1990s. Believe it or not, none of those foods would be considered “healthy” under the FDA’s current guidelines.
“We used to believe that sugary cereals were fine, as long as they were fortified with vitamins and minerals,” Katherine Tallmadge, a nutritionist, told NBC News. “Now we want people to eat the whole food — whole grains.”
Under the old rules, “healthy” foods must meet give government criteria on fat, saturated fat, sodium, cholesterol and nutrients.
Congress is also urging the FDA to update what is and is not healthy.
Now the FDA is beginning the process of redefining what “healthy” means.
“Consumers want to make informed food choices and it is the FDA’s responsibility to help them by ensuring labels provide accurate and reliable nutrition information. In light of evolving nutrition research, forthcoming Nutrition Facts Labeling final rules, and a citizen petition, we believe now is an opportune time to reevaluate regulations concerning nutrient content claims, generally, including the term ‘healthy.’ We plan to solicit public comment on these issues in the near future,” the FDA stated.
RELATED: Congress takes discouraging turn on school lunches
For years, the FDA has been under pressure to define what a “natural” food is.
Tom Costello









