VILLA PARK, Ill. — “Whatever it takes.” That was the unofficial refrain for last weekend’s fast food workers’ convention in the suburbs of Chicago, where over 1,300 low-wage employees gathered to profess their dedication to the cause. On Saturday, the second and final day of the convention, workers unanimously passed a resolution to keep fighting and keep striking until they had won union representation and a $15 hourly wage. Many of the convention attendees wanted to go further — even suggesting breaking the law.
“We need a nationwide sit,” Mary Coleman, Milwaukee-based Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen employee and grandmother of six, told the other workers. “Across the nation, all fast food workers, retail workers, we pick a time, we pick a day, and everybody just stops.”
Coleman spoke about the need for a nationwide sit-down strike during Saturday’s pre-lunch discussion period, when she and other workers from the audience were given the opportunity to answer questions such as, “What else can we do in our cities to increase pressure on low-wage employers and grow our movement?”
She wasn’t the only one to suggest more radical tactics than the day-long strikes which have thus far been the movement’s calling card. A male audience member said workers should form human chains to prevent consumers from entering fast food restaurants. “Be aggressive in hitting their bottom lines,” he said.
“We need to go on strike indefinitely,” said another.
These apparently unprompted suggestions from the audience suggest popular support within the movement’s rank-and-file for an escalation of tactics. Although the resolution adopted on Saturday did not specify what sort of strategy the fast food workers would employ going forward, movement leadership seemed to endorse a shift toward more radical methods at several points during the conference.
“We are going to break the law,” Nancy Salgado, a McDonald’s employee and leader among the local Illinois workers, said from the stage. “We’ve got to do whatever it takes to win, and we’ve got to do civil disobedience. We’ve got to do it.”
Salgado was one of over 100 workers to get arrested during a May protest at McDonald’s headquarters in Oak Brook, Ill. She and several other workers who were arrested on that day spoke at the convention and assured other workers that it is relatively safe to commit acts of civil disobedience on behalf of the cause.
“It wasn’t nothing to be scared of. We were in, we were out, we were back home with our families,” said Melinda Topel, a McDonald’s worker from Kansas City, Mo. “And I guarantee you that if everyone in this room did civil disobedience, these corporations would have to listen to us.”
The 13-person fast food workers’ steering committee, which also MC’d the convention, had final approval over the scheduled events, including the one where Salgado, Topel and others discussed their arrests. The powerful labor union SEIU has poured millions of dollars into backing the fast food workers, but its not quite clear how its officials would feel about more confrontational fast food demonstrations. What is known is that SEIU president Mary Kay Henry, who delivered a laudatory speech to the workers on Friday night, was among those arrested at the May protest outside McDonald’s headquarters.
As the movement has grown in size — from 200 workers in one city back in November 2012, to thousands of workers in 150 cities just two months ago — it has attracted other prominent supporters. Two of them delivered speeches on Saturday: Congressional Progressive Caucus chair Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., and Rev. William Barber, leader of North Carolina’s Moral Mondays protests. Ellison described the fast food strikes as “the most important worker movement in America today,” while Rev. Barber portrayed them as part of a much larger, modern-day civil rights struggle.
“I think it’s possible with the movement; when you connect these movements,” Rev. Barber told msnbc, when asked if the fast food workers’ demands were achievable in North Carolina. “When you connect the call for $15, for voting rights, to all of the other movements. This is a civil rights issue, [and] it’s an economic issue.”








