Fifty years ago, President Kennedy declared, “We choose to go to the moon in this decade.” In order to put a man on the moon we had to have a scientific revolution–and we had one. We heavily funded scientific research and development. We emphasized teaching evidence-based science in our schools.
Our moon landing was humanity’s first giant leap. Fifty years later, the Space Race is over and that scientific revolution has ended.
Scientific innovation has driven our country, from the light bulb to the microchip. We split the atom and made the airplane. And if we want to continue making cutting edge scientific discoveries, we must have a new scientific revolution. We need a second Giant Leap for humankind!
To launch this second Giant Leap we need a new investment in science. America must also have a cultural shift: we must have fewer people deny evidence-based science.
According to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), in “the past two years, federal nondefense [research and development] has declined by 5 percent, after a largely stagnant decade.” This grim picture will look even worse if the upcoming budget sequester happens. Science funding will be cut by at least 50 billion dollars over the next five years, according to the AAAS. The former director of the National Institute of Health said the sequester will “maim our innovation capabilities.”
Instead of slashing science funding, we need a massive new investment in science. President Obama said in his State of the Union address, “now is the time to reach a level of research and development not seen since the height of the Space Race.” We agree; our student movement for a second Giant Leap is calling for one trillion dollars in funding for new research and development over the next decade.
Some people question whether it is fiscally responsible to spend one trillion dollars on science while we are struggling to pay off our existing debts. Funding science is fiscally responsible and is a moral imperative. As President Obama noted in the State of the Union, every dollar that was spent on the Human Genome Project created $140 for our economy. The return on investment in scientific innovation is estimated by scholars to be “ranging from 30% to over 100%.” When Congress crafts a budget, we believe they should recognize return on scientific investment in it.
We also need a revolution in how America views science. Forty-six percent of Americans deny evolution. Sixty percent of American public school biology teachers do not teach evolution properly. Thirteen percent more teach creationism outright.









